More from
The Gates of Janus.
Colin Wilson wrote the (rather lengthy) introduction and in it makes frequent reference to his long-time correspondence with Brady. I'd assumed that meant they were friends or something. Heh. Brady isn't all that impressed with Wilson (or crime-writers/journalists of any kind) and gives some scathing criticism of Wilson's interpretation of some things.
Another note -- Brady addresses the reader directly quite a lot. Not exactly novel but in this case is oddly invasive. It feels like he's reaching through the page, grabbing my collar and yanking my face in close. It's not allowing me to distance very well and I keep sinking into deep introspection, mulling over the questions. It's a bruisy, slightly uncomfortable feeling that follows me long after I've shut the book.
--------
More or less, all but the constitutionally inadequate possess the wish for power, but many lack the will. The desire to be insubordinate and autonomous, reach mercurial heights, psychically transfuse the blood of gods into the veins, is more common than the ability to do so. Conscience confounds the majority. The remainder, in my opinion, are as culpable as the criminal. In brief, sanctioned by law or no, elitism is the soul of criminality. (64)
Studying humanity with the objective detachment of a spectre -- my active, free participation in the human comedy now being constrained by manganese-steel bars and electronic eyes -- I have observed nothing in the social evolution of mankind to shake my lack of faith in human nature in general. (65)
Audience reaction, rather than the discriminating wisdom and inherent superiority of individual judgment, is the critical factor in defining a 'criminal', an 'outsider', someone not running with the herd or going with the prevailing popular flow.
"Treason doth never prosper, what's the reason? For if it
prosper, none dare call it treason." ~ Sir John Harrington (1561-1612)
(77)
It is rather significant to note that those members of the lower classes who assiduously adhere to law and prevailing morality usually display a smug self-righteousness, which appears to be based on the patent delusion that their virtuous qualities are inborn, rather than evidence of a servile constitution predisposed to the influence of social engineering. (77)
Morality does not enter into the equation except in the shoddy guise of derisively pious editorials, reminiscent, in shallow sympathy and ersatz horror, of the lucrative ramblings of the late Edgar Lustgarten. This self-styled media 'criminologist,' a jaundice-jowled, lugubrious little specimen with the eyes of a carp, the ethics of a minnow and the ambience of a ripe red herring, physically personified what every media sensationalist should be obliged to look like as a warning to others.
The sensationalists shrewdly appreciate that when it comes to serial killers or killings, the general public has the infinite attention span of lower primates assiduously searching for fleas.
The illusion of having a 'good reputation' to maintain can be a most corrupting preoccupation, whereas confessing to a bad reputation is often highly virtuous.
You should never doubt your own experience in favor of other people's opinions, no matter how loftily they berate you with them. Hypocrisy adores exalted heights to condescend from. (79)
Steal an apple, you are a thief; steal a country, you are a statesman. (82)
Society, if you believe such a thing exists, trains and constrains the individual to counterfeit surface respect for powerful personages and outmoded conventions which, in truth, the large majority abhor and despise.
Therefore, there exists in every free-thinking person a tenacious tension between that which they know to be their genuine beliefs and desires, and the grotesque proprieties and social protocols they reluctantly pay homage to under duress. The resulting psychic conflict creates a neurotic self-contempt, a mordant doubt that they possess the will or spiritual strength needed to throw off such tight bridles and assert unconditional individuality, even at the risk of their disconsolate lives. (82)
Contrary to Ian Fleming, you only live once. Therefore, a person should consciously choose whether to exist as a grey daub on a grey canvas, or as an existential riot of every color in the spectrum. You know which of these alternatives the serial killer selects, action-painting with his knife on a human canvas, each slash-splash creating a unique masterpiece. Not for sale but nevertheless widely viewed with fascination by most.
By all means punish or execute the transgressors, but do not bore them to death with concepts based entirely on social engineering flatteringly disguised as divine wisdom. (83)